The Exiled https://theexiled.pwnageservers.com/forum/ |
|
Intel vs. AMD https://theexiled.pwnageservers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1040 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | TE-Pengwin [ Thu Jan 26, 2006 10:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Intel vs. AMD |
which is better overall |
Author: | TE-4ev3r [ Fri Jan 27, 2006 10:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Neutral. :/ |
Author: | TE-Pengwin [ Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:23 am ] |
Post subject: | |
meh u kno AMD is better btw like me new sig? changed the saying a bit |
Author: | TE-Gooberman [ Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:28 am ] |
Post subject: | |
death is standard....meaning that ur penguin comes with death? so u get it after u've died? or...it comes with death in the sense that it follows 'death' around. i dont know. i find it very cnfusing ![]() |
Author: | TE-Mr. Sniffy [ Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:12 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Rebel Power(I voted Intel)! |
Author: | TE-Pengwin [ Sat Jan 28, 2006 9:53 am ] | ||
Post subject: | |||
BOOOOOOO BOOOOO |
Author: | |WAR| Antimatter [ Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
im getting a new computer so ive done alot of research. amd does pwn hard. the athlon's are cheaper, and many have are 64 bit. some even out perform intel's. BUT intel has a key feature that athlon's dont, they shut off when they over heat, athlon's just melt and then ur fucked. intel wins. |
Author: | TE-4ev3r [ Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:34 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | |||
Actually, I don't. I'm no comp genius like all you peeps. |
Author: | TE-Pengwin [ Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:39 am ] |
Post subject: | |
my god in order for ur AMD to melt u have to have like no heatsink at all...AMD's run at liek 10 degrees celsius lower thatn intels if u have like 1 fan and a heatsink it will never fry unless ur out in the desert |
Author: | Exit Mundi [ Sun Jan 29, 2006 2:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Ahem.If i may shed some light on the situation. My opinion: AMD pwnz. AMD: Uses lower frequencies more efficiently,thus,runs at P4 speed or faster,and it runs 10C-50C cooler.In order for it to melt, the heatsink would have to be off.And my Athlon 64 3000+ does do a automatic shutoff at a temp i set.Also,AMD is cheaper for the low to mid range CPU's,but super expensive for high range,but all one really needs is a mid range. Intel:Came first,has most publicity,and has the cheapest dual core around,also has highest frequencies.Into that,it runs hotter than hell (the 3.4Ghz's in my school are running at 62idle to melting at almost any load,5 are melted out of 15,5 more have melted mobos.),and often REQUIRE water cooling.They also have lower FSBs,and garbage tech support. I just like my A64 running 25C-35C. |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |