u shouldve done ATi vs nVidia
| The Exiled http://theexiled.pwnageservers.com/forum/ |
|
| English help.... PLZ http://theexiled.pwnageservers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=1132 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | TE-Hybrd$n!pr [ Mon Mar 20, 2006 2:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | English help.... PLZ |
ok in my english 2 class we have to write a paper on somethin that is conterversial (i no i spelld that wrong but sound it out lol ^_^) and since i was last to flpin choose....damd last name crap.. i went with Intel pentium prossesors VS. AMD prossesors and i was hopeing if u guys already had information on this if u could post it here and the site u got it from so i can make source cards and all that fun shizzy. but if u do not have a website or a magazine that it came from i cnt use it because i gotta have a "source" gay i no but i gotta fallow the guide lines..so if u guys could help me id appreciate it |
|
| Author: | |WAR| Antimatter [ Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
LOL! |
|
| Author: | TE-Gooberman [ Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
well...i've cobbled together all my info and knowledge from too many sources to count. sorry. all i can tell u is...u got the worst project i've ever heard of >..> |
|
| Author: | TE-Hammy [ Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
u shouldve done ATi vs nVidia
|
|
| Author: | TE-Hybrd$n!pr [ Tue Mar 21, 2006 8:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
thanks guys... god forbid ne one could actualy give me ne GOOD info instad of ur opinions lol |
|
| Author: | TE-Noxwizard [ Tue Mar 21, 2006 9:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I believe there is a thread like this in General Discussion. |
|
| Author: | TE-Krogoth [ Tue Mar 21, 2006 9:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
AMD WINS DUAL-CORE DUEL Competition Refuses to Step into the Ring; Industry Benchmarks Validate Victory. The Champ With the AMD64 platform, we established our leadership in 64-bit computing. Now we are proud to be leading the computing industry in dual-core x86 performance and performance-per-watt. As part of the original challenge issued to Intel by AMD, power consumption was a consideration. Mainstream Dual-Core AMD Opteron™ processors at 95 watts, consume far less than the competition’s dual-core x86 server processors which according to their published data, have a thermal design power of 135 watts and a max power draw of 150 watts. This can result in 200 percent better performance-per-watt than the competition. Even greater performance-per-watt can be achieved with lower-power Dual-Core AMD Opteron processors that are available in 55 watt offerings. Experience the performance advantages of multi-core processors and get the best performance per watt available in the market. AMD PowerNow!™ technology can reduce CPU power at idle up to 75%. Industry Leading Performance In addition to the customer-centric features that clearly position AMD as the multi-core leader, published SPEC benchmarks validate that AMD has a multi-core performance lead over its competitor. Those benchmarks include: SPECint® rate2000 – the Dual-Core AMD Opteron processor Model 280 outperforms the dual-core Xeon 2.8GHz processor by 28 percent SPECfp® rate2000 – The Dual-Core AMD Opteron processor Model 280 outperforms the dual-core Xeon 2.8GHz processor by 76 percent SPECjbb®2005 – The Dual-Core AMD Opteron processor Model 280 outperforms the dual-core Xeon 2.8GHz by 13 percent The Dual-Core AMD Opteron processor provides leading-edge performance for x86 servers and workstations. It has won every major industry-standard benchmark for x86 servers it has competed for since its introduction in April 2005. The future of dual-core computing is here today. And you’ll find the best performing solution with AMD and our revolutionary Direct Connect Architecture. Multi-Core Advantages Improved system performance for computers running multiple applications Enhanced performance for multi-threaded applications Support for more users or tasks for transaction-intensive applications AMD’s Revolutionary Direct Connect Architecture Addresses and helps reduce the real challenges and bottlenecks of system architecture because everything is directly connected to the CPU Directly connects the processor cores in a single die to even further reduce latencies between processors http://www.amd.com/us-en/0,,3715_13368_ ... dir=CPSW51 |
|
| Author: | TheShodan [ Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
That post reaks of opinion, krogoth. Look for a better source. And besides... AMD is cheaper than Intel. Wins by default  .
|
|
| Author: | TE-Noxwizard [ Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Cheapness over quality, hmm.... |
|
| Author: | TE-Hybrd$n!pr [ Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
thanks krog.. and cheapness with AMD dosent mean its bad. my AMD Drunon prossor cost me 30 bucks and it is one of the best prossesors ive ever been on(this includes my schools intel pentium 4s) |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|